Contacts: Paul Sein Twa Email: pseintwa@yahoo.com, Phone +66 (0) 817 247 093 (English)
Wong Aung Email: wongaung@gmail.com, Phone +66(0) 857 133 344 (Burmese)
Sai Sai Email: saisaiy2k@hotmail.com, Phone +66(0) 897 557 354 (Thai)
Burmese Regime Neglecting Environmental Protection:
New report highlights need for sound environment and development policy framework in postelection
Burma
Press Release from the Burma Environment Working Group
EMBARGOED until 10a.m. Bangkok time, 25 July 2011.
Bangkok, Thailand: A new report highlights how Burma lacks any meaningful frameworks on
environmental protection and sustainable development that would enable citizens to take part in
decision-making about their country’s development, despite a recent transition to a military-dominated
parliamentary political system. Land tenure remains weak and there are no safeguards in place to
protect farmers, according to the groundbreaking report by the Burma Environment Working Group
(BEWG), which is the first ever to take aim at Burma’s environment as a whole.
The 100-page publication, entitled Burma’s Environment: People, Problems, Policies, demonstrates
serious risks facing Burma’s extensive biodiversity and abundant natural resources, and it challenges the
direction the country is taking toward increased large-scale resource extraction projects in the oil, gas,
hydropower and mining sectors. Burma is a state party to several international treaties relating to the
environment, but according to the report it is unclear whether the contents of those treaties have been
ratified in practice and incorporated into domestic law.
“As opposed to the Burmese regime's strategy of political consolidation, many international treaties and
conventions recognize the rights of local people as key stakeholders in decision making about the
sustainable use and management of natural resources,” said Paul Sein Twa, convener of BEWG. “The
Burmese regime evidently became party to some of these treaties to present a favorable image to the
outside world. Thus far, the thin facade of governance mechanisms, national environmental laws and
policies that exists in Burma has been driven by external influence, rather than by any genuine Burmese
government interest in environmental issues and people's needs. Although the current government now
has a thin varnish of legitimacy it still has neither the political will nor the commitment to deal with
environmental affairs” Sein Twa added.
Burma does have domestic laws and policies related to protecting people and the environment,
according to the report, but the country lacks the necessary administrative and legal structures,
standards, safeguards and political will to enforce such provisions or to clarify the rights and duties they
create. Burma’s recent move to a capitalist market economy with lingering socialist ideology, law, and
policies has left farmers and the urban poor highly vulnerable to companies operating in a virtually
unregulated and partial market economy, according to BEWG.
The report outlines that many civil society organizations are active in Burma on important projects and
programs related to environmental protection and sustainable development, both inside the country
and on its borders.
The report also finds that while they do not provide loans to Burma, international financial institutions
such as the World Bank and International Monetary Fund remain engaged in the country. The Asian
Development Bank in particular provides assistance through various channels and promotes private
investment, impacting on the environment and local communities, according to the report.
As a whole, the report highlights the contentious nature of the natural environment in Burma today,
particularly with respect to the irresponsible construction of large dams, untimely oil and gas extraction,
unregulated mining, rampant deforestation, massive agricultural concessions, and the destructive illegal
wildlife trade. Control over natural resources is a major cause of conflict in Burma’s ethnic areas, where
the majority of the country’s economically viable natural resources are located. Foreign direct
investment in Burma often results in militarization and displacement, according to BEWG, and given the
lack of sound policies and the unwillingness of the state to reconcile with ethnic armed groups,
increases in foreign investment pose major risks to the environment and communities living in these
areas.
Figures released by the Burmese authorities last month revealed that Foreign Direct Investment for the
last year reached USD $20 billion, the vast majority of which was in oil, gas and power sectors.
“Foreign direct investment in Burma’s natural environment is skyrocketing,” said Sein Twa of BEWG,
“but there is no corresponding attention to environmental protection, multi-ethnic participation, and
sustainable development.” Sein Twa continued “Thein Sein’s government is failing to make progress on
these fronts. If the international community wants to help Burma pursue national reconciliation,
democracy and an end to poverty, they must recognize that engaging on good governance; multi-ethnic
participation and sustainable development are equal in importance to their political and economic
agendas.”
BEWG recommends that Burma must have a sound policy framework for environmental protection and
sustainable development. Until then new foreign investors investing in energy, extractive and
plantation sectors should refrain from investing. Existing investors should immediately cease all projectrelated
work - particularly in sensitive areas throughout Burma - until adequate safeguards are in place
to ensure investment does not lead to unnecessary destruction of the natural environment and local
livelihoods. At the same time, International NGOs and UN agencies should ensure people are recognized
as key actors in their own development, rather than passive recipients of commodities and services, and
civil society organizations should empower communities throughout Burma to understand their rights.
“The renewed war in Kachin state is an example of what Burma can continue to expect as foreign direct
investment increases,” said Sein Twa, referring to the conflict that reignited June 9 between the Kachin
Independence Army and the Burma Army around Chinese-led hydropower dams in Kachin State.
“Without genuine multi-ethnic participation and a sound regulatory framework, Burma’s environment
will continue to be a source of conflict.”
ABOUT BEWG
The Burma Environmental Working Group (BEWG) brings together Burma focused ethnic environmental
and social organizations. Member organizations monitor Burma development policy and advocates for
alternative development policies meeting their specific traditional and comprehensive understanding of
local sustainability. BEWG provides a forum for member organizations to combine the successes,
knowledge, expertise and voices of ethnic peoples in pursuit of not just local livelihoods, but sustainable
and peaceful national, regional and international development policy. Members collaborate on
research, reporting, advocacy campaigns, capacity-building initiatives and policy formulation. BEWG also
networks with non-member organizations to encourage harmony and diversity in its own activities as
well as strengthen democracy and civil society in Burma.
Wong Aung Email: wongaung@gmail.com, Phone +66(0) 857 133 344 (Burmese)
Sai Sai Email: saisaiy2k@hotmail.com, Phone +66(0) 897 557 354 (Thai)
Burmese Regime Neglecting Environmental Protection:
New report highlights need for sound environment and development policy framework in postelection
Burma
Press Release from the Burma Environment Working Group
EMBARGOED until 10a.m. Bangkok time, 25 July 2011.
Bangkok, Thailand: A new report highlights how Burma lacks any meaningful frameworks on
environmental protection and sustainable development that would enable citizens to take part in
decision-making about their country’s development, despite a recent transition to a military-dominated
parliamentary political system. Land tenure remains weak and there are no safeguards in place to
protect farmers, according to the groundbreaking report by the Burma Environment Working Group
(BEWG), which is the first ever to take aim at Burma’s environment as a whole.
The 100-page publication, entitled Burma’s Environment: People, Problems, Policies, demonstrates
serious risks facing Burma’s extensive biodiversity and abundant natural resources, and it challenges the
direction the country is taking toward increased large-scale resource extraction projects in the oil, gas,
hydropower and mining sectors. Burma is a state party to several international treaties relating to the
environment, but according to the report it is unclear whether the contents of those treaties have been
ratified in practice and incorporated into domestic law.
“As opposed to the Burmese regime's strategy of political consolidation, many international treaties and
conventions recognize the rights of local people as key stakeholders in decision making about the
sustainable use and management of natural resources,” said Paul Sein Twa, convener of BEWG. “The
Burmese regime evidently became party to some of these treaties to present a favorable image to the
outside world. Thus far, the thin facade of governance mechanisms, national environmental laws and
policies that exists in Burma has been driven by external influence, rather than by any genuine Burmese
government interest in environmental issues and people's needs. Although the current government now
has a thin varnish of legitimacy it still has neither the political will nor the commitment to deal with
environmental affairs” Sein Twa added.
Burma does have domestic laws and policies related to protecting people and the environment,
according to the report, but the country lacks the necessary administrative and legal structures,
standards, safeguards and political will to enforce such provisions or to clarify the rights and duties they
create. Burma’s recent move to a capitalist market economy with lingering socialist ideology, law, and
policies has left farmers and the urban poor highly vulnerable to companies operating in a virtually
unregulated and partial market economy, according to BEWG.
The report outlines that many civil society organizations are active in Burma on important projects and
programs related to environmental protection and sustainable development, both inside the country
and on its borders.
The report also finds that while they do not provide loans to Burma, international financial institutions
such as the World Bank and International Monetary Fund remain engaged in the country. The Asian
Development Bank in particular provides assistance through various channels and promotes private
investment, impacting on the environment and local communities, according to the report.
As a whole, the report highlights the contentious nature of the natural environment in Burma today,
particularly with respect to the irresponsible construction of large dams, untimely oil and gas extraction,
unregulated mining, rampant deforestation, massive agricultural concessions, and the destructive illegal
wildlife trade. Control over natural resources is a major cause of conflict in Burma’s ethnic areas, where
the majority of the country’s economically viable natural resources are located. Foreign direct
investment in Burma often results in militarization and displacement, according to BEWG, and given the
lack of sound policies and the unwillingness of the state to reconcile with ethnic armed groups,
increases in foreign investment pose major risks to the environment and communities living in these
areas.
Figures released by the Burmese authorities last month revealed that Foreign Direct Investment for the
last year reached USD $20 billion, the vast majority of which was in oil, gas and power sectors.
“Foreign direct investment in Burma’s natural environment is skyrocketing,” said Sein Twa of BEWG,
“but there is no corresponding attention to environmental protection, multi-ethnic participation, and
sustainable development.” Sein Twa continued “Thein Sein’s government is failing to make progress on
these fronts. If the international community wants to help Burma pursue national reconciliation,
democracy and an end to poverty, they must recognize that engaging on good governance; multi-ethnic
participation and sustainable development are equal in importance to their political and economic
agendas.”
BEWG recommends that Burma must have a sound policy framework for environmental protection and
sustainable development. Until then new foreign investors investing in energy, extractive and
plantation sectors should refrain from investing. Existing investors should immediately cease all projectrelated
work - particularly in sensitive areas throughout Burma - until adequate safeguards are in place
to ensure investment does not lead to unnecessary destruction of the natural environment and local
livelihoods. At the same time, International NGOs and UN agencies should ensure people are recognized
as key actors in their own development, rather than passive recipients of commodities and services, and
civil society organizations should empower communities throughout Burma to understand their rights.
“The renewed war in Kachin state is an example of what Burma can continue to expect as foreign direct
investment increases,” said Sein Twa, referring to the conflict that reignited June 9 between the Kachin
Independence Army and the Burma Army around Chinese-led hydropower dams in Kachin State.
“Without genuine multi-ethnic participation and a sound regulatory framework, Burma’s environment
will continue to be a source of conflict.”
ABOUT BEWG
The Burma Environmental Working Group (BEWG) brings together Burma focused ethnic environmental
and social organizations. Member organizations monitor Burma development policy and advocates for
alternative development policies meeting their specific traditional and comprehensive understanding of
local sustainability. BEWG provides a forum for member organizations to combine the successes,
knowledge, expertise and voices of ethnic peoples in pursuit of not just local livelihoods, but sustainable
and peaceful national, regional and international development policy. Members collaborate on
research, reporting, advocacy campaigns, capacity-building initiatives and policy formulation. BEWG also
networks with non-member organizations to encourage harmony and diversity in its own activities as
well as strengthen democracy and civil society in Burma.
0 comments:
Post a Comment